Government has power to block tweets as well as accounts for as long as it wants, says Karnataka HC, imposes ₹50 lakh exemplary cost on Twitter·June 30, 2023
Civil society groups initiate campaign against restriction of protests to Freedom Park in Bengaluru·June 29, 2023
Defying Supreme Court Order freezing the sedition provision, FIR under 124A filed against Manipur politician·June 24, 2023
Allahabad High Court interdicts Al Jazeera from releasing documentary with ‘negative portrayal of State functionaries’ in India·June 15, 2023
Law Commission recommends retaining sedition as a crime; suggests making the law more stringent ·June 2, 2023
International Religious Freedom Report: Why does domestic pride turn to international shame for the current regime?·June 2, 2023
Disallowing name change application violative of rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 21 of the Constitution: Allahabad HC·May 31, 2023
All India Trade Union Congress calls the Delhi Police’s act of arresting wrestlers undemocratic·May 29, 2023
‘Can’t make fundamental rights dependent on public display of emotion’, says SC, stays ban on ‘The Kerala Story’ in West Bengal·May 18, 2023
Andhra Pradesh High Court quashes state government order imposing a blanket ban on roadside public meetings·May 12, 2023
SC restrains Assam police from arresting advocate under UAPA for FB post allegedly praising Taliban·May 3, 2023
Fact-checking unit that makes ‘State the sole arbiter of truth or falsity of online speech’ not to be notified till July 5, Union government assures Bombay HC·April 27, 2023
Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR against college prof for Whatsapp status message critical of Article 370 abrogation·April 15, 2023
Here is why the Supreme Court quashed Union’s de facto ban on Malayalam TV news channel MediaOne·April 6, 2023
