Accepting the usual arguments about “unusual circumstances”, Supreme Court extends ED director’s tenure to September 15·July 27, 2023
Uttarakhand High Court suspends district judge for being absent during recording of evidence·July 27, 2023
BJP’s Pasmanda outreach will remain a hollow gesture in absence of reservation benefits·July 27, 2023
Refusing to let go of ED director, Union government makes another request of the SC to extend his tenure till October 15·July 26, 2023
Teesta Setalvad and Arnab Goswami are exceptions, Umar Khalid is a tragedy, but more than four lakh undertrials are a statistic·July 26, 2023
Delhi High Court calls for cheaper drugs and better care for patients suffering from spinal muscular atrophy·July 25, 2023
SC refuses to grant stay on delimitation in Assam, asks Union and state governments to file replies within three weeks·July 24, 2023
Money for the dead but none for the living, the Indian Community Welfare Fund in Gulf countries·July 24, 2023
Why the recent US Supreme Court judgment on affirmative action is a race to the bottom India should avoid·July 23, 2023
Revisiting the shortcomings of the Disaster Management Act in light of the Delhi floods·July 23, 2023
No mahapanchayat, but mega-hate against Muslims lurks: Uttarakhand High Court to hear suggestions on addressing structural violence against the community·July 22, 2023
Yasin Malik could have been killed or escaped: Tushar Mehta in letter to home secretary; Tihar orders probe·July 22, 2023
SC declines PIL to protect complainants of sexual harassment against retaliation at workplace: Is the law adequate?·July 22, 2023
‘Conflict between clauses’: Why has the Supreme Court decided to interpret Article 239AA again?·July 22, 2023
