After 70 years of concurrence and consultation, why retain the empty shell of Article 370? Rakesh Dwivedi on Day 14 of the hearings·September 1, 2023
Supreme Court adjourns hearing on the dispute over Gautam Navlakha’s place of house arrest by eight weeks·September 1, 2023
Article 370(3) was a fail-safe in case Article 370(1) did not function as intended for integration of J&K with India, Harish Salve on Day 13 of hearings·September 1, 2023
Years after conviction, fine gets paid in Bilkis Bano case: Supreme Court questions the need·August 31, 2023
Indira Jaising writes to the CJI on subtleties of gender stereotyping, suggests combat measures·August 30, 2023
Continued bitterness, dead emotions and long separation a facet of cruelty; sufficient to grant divorce: Supreme Court·August 30, 2023
At Bengaluru event, discussants examine religious, and caste and class-based changes in India in the last few decades·August 30, 2023
NHRC issues notice to Uttar Pradesh government over the Muzaffarnagar schoolchild beating incident·August 30, 2023
Article 370 contained the seed of its own destruction, argues Tushar Mehta on Day 12 of hearings·August 29, 2023
Punjab and Haryana High Court extends stay on WFI elections, Supreme Court refuses to intervene·August 29, 2023
Protestors march to Canadian PM’s office against rising “human rights violations” by Hindutva supremacist groups·August 28, 2023
Christening new criminal law Bills in Hindi and Sanskrit reflects majoritarian state of mind, say protesting Chennai advocates·August 26, 2023
Process erasing will of people of J&K with mala fide intent can never legitimately affect Article 370, Nitya Ramakrishnan on Day 9 of Article 370 hearings·August 23, 2023
Supreme Court stays Order directing Azam Khan to give voice sample, issues notice to UP government·August 23, 2023
