“Tomorrow if the Parliament says it is the Constituent Assembly, can it do away with the basic structure of the Indian Constitution?” ask petitioners on Day 2 of Article 370 hearings·August 3, 2023
On Day 15, quoting Ambedkar, V. Giri calls abrogation rightful centralisation to prevent another loss of India’s independence·September 4, 2023
Acknowledging the ‘question of self-determination’ that OHCHR Kashmir report raises will be path-breaking·June 23, 2018
Hyderpora encounter: Supreme Court reserves judgment in father’s plea for exhumation of son’s body to perform last rites·August 30, 2022
“Though the Constitution is a political document, its provisions cannot be manipulated for political ends,” argues Kapil Sibal of Day 3 of Article 370 hearings·August 8, 2023
Life normal, peace ascendant and stones silent in Kashmir, Union government affidavit tells Supreme Court on eve of Article 370 hearings·July 11, 2023
Article 370 was temporary only from the perspective of J&K, not India, Dushyant Dave on Day 7 of Article 370 hearings·August 17, 2023
Report Flags Human Rights Violations in Post-Lockdown Kashmir, Alleges Severe Restrictions on Civil Liberties·February 16, 2021
India’s ‘honour’ not its ‘incorporeal property’, says J&K and Ladakh HC in Fahad Shah Order·November 20, 2023
WATCH | Government plans separate townships for nomadic Gujjars & Bakerwals in Kashmir·August 8, 2019
Disagreeing with govt is not sediton, says SC; dismisses PIL against Farooq Abdullah for statements against Art 370 abrogation; imposes costs on petitioners·March 3, 2021
Jammu & Kashmir: Karan Singh demands release of all political leaders, political dialogue·August 21, 2019
Is appearing in a court of law against state interest? It might be if you are a Kashmiri, as petitioner-in-person Zahoor Ahmad Bhat found out·September 3, 2023
