Anti-defection law not a weapon for a leader who has lost the numbers, contest respondents in Shiv Sena rift case·February 16, 2023
As Supreme Court mulls referring Shiv Sena dispute to a Constitution bench, Tenth Schedule’s relevance comes under scrutiny·July 20, 2022
In the aftermath of the SC judgment in the Maharashtra political crisis case, more questions sprout·May 18, 2023
Maharashtra crisis: Dissent within party does not incur the wrath of disqualification, argues Shinde camp before Supreme Court·March 1, 2023
Maharashtra Crisis: Supreme Court to hear Thackeray faction’s plea on allotment of ‘Bow and Arrow’ symbol to Shinde faction·July 10, 2023
Maharashtra political crisis: Discretion of Governor cannot be used to topple a legitimate government, argue petitioners·February 23, 2023
Maharashtra political crisis: Proceedings under the Tenth Schedule operate independently of the power of governor, argues Shinde camp·March 1, 2023
Maharashtra political crisis: Supreme Court voices serious concerns over the role of the governor in breaking legitimate government·March 16, 2023
Maharashtra Shiv Sena split: Supreme Court gives speaker a week to create a schedule to decide on disqualifications·September 18, 2023
Maharashtra speaker berated for indecision on disqualification petitions despite SC Order·October 13, 2023
SC to hear pleas by Sharad Pawar and Uddhav Thackeray on disqualification petitions pending with the speaker·October 13, 2023
Shiv Sena challenges Maharashtra Governor’s invitation to Eknath Shinde to form government in Supreme Court·July 9, 2022
Shiv Sena tussle before the Supreme Court and the Election Commission: Prelude to the Supreme Court’s framing of issues·August 3, 2022
Shiv Sena versus Shiv Sena: Outgoing CJI may frame the issues to be decided by a larger bench·August 4, 2022
Speaker can never be an unbiased umpire in the game of politics, says petitioner in Shiv Sena dual-faction case·February 15, 2023