Constitutional challenge to Sabarimala Temple ban on women’s entry: Read Indira Jaising’s written submissions·July 17, 2018
Right to keep women away from Sabarimala temple is a form of untouchability: Indira Jaising to Supreme Court·July 18, 2018
Sabarimala case: Justice Chandrachud says assuming women cannot perform 41-day penance is unconstitutional·July 24, 2018
Sabarimala, Day 5: Lord Ayappa is a juristic person, but does Constitution favour gods over individuals?·July 26, 2018
The ‘celibacy vs menstruation’ non-debate: Why arguments for Sabarimala temple’s ban on women are flawed·July 28, 2018
Last day of Sabarimala: Rights of deity as a juristic entity are for suing and being sued: Read Indira Jaising’s additional rejoinder submissions·August 2, 2018
Female genital mutilation must be abolished because it’s criminally liable abuse of the girl child, and hardly an ‘essential religious practice’·August 20, 2018
Vague, unreasonable, constitutionally untenable: Why Indian variant of ‘blasphemy law’ – Section 295A IPC – should go·August 21, 2018
Mob-lynching: Supreme Court asks errant States to file compliance reports within a week·September 7, 2018
#Section377: Bigotry disguised as religious sentiments has no place in the court of law·September 12, 2018
Blasphemy laws remain philosophically fallacious, legally unconstitutional; so remove IPC 295A, don’t bolster it·September 25, 2018
Is the refusal to refer Ismail Faruqui judgment to a larger bench a victory or defeat for Muslims?·October 6, 2018
#Sabarimala: Dissent from the dissent of Justice Indu Malhotra: New boundaries for Article 14?·October 22, 2018
On Sabarimala and Ayodhya, BJP willing to court contempt of court to stoke communal fires·October 29, 2018
Cannot defend the indefensible: The unconstitutional case of female genital mutilation·November 28, 2018
Despite pliant media, VHP-RSS meet at Ayodhya was a flop; Supreme Court mustn’t buckle under communal pressure·November 29, 2018
