#Sabarimala: Dissent from the dissent of Justice Indu Malhotra: New boundaries for Article 14?·October 22, 2018
Ayodhya dispute: Centre files application in the Supreme Court to allow it to return undisputed excess land to owners·January 29, 2019
Vague, unreasonable, constitutionally untenable: Why Indian variant of ‘blasphemy law’ – Section 295A IPC – should go·August 21, 2018
Karnataka hijab ban: opinions from Supreme Court’s Sabarimala judgment show the way·February 24, 2022
Last day of Sabarimala: Rights of deity as a juristic entity are for suing and being sued: Read Indira Jaising’s additional rejoinder submissions·August 2, 2018
Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi case: Constitution bench to pass further orders on Jan 29; Justice UU Lalit recuses himself·January 10, 2019
‘Why does the Government Order refer to judgments on hijab, if it’s innocuous’, Karnataka HC asks state government·February 18, 2022
The Karnataka hijab ban makes central the very thing that is constitutionally shunned·February 20, 2022
First case of love jihad under Gujarat Freedom of Religion Act: separating truth from propaganda·October 12, 2021
PIL seeking ban on prayers in Kendriya Vidyalayas ‘propagating Hinduism’ referred to larger bench by the Supreme Court·January 28, 2019
Civil Society writes to President Kovind seeking a commission of inquiry into the manner of investigation of communal violence in North-East Delhi ·July 19, 2020