Ban on hijab valid, not violative of Article 25: PU College and CDC argue before Karnataka HC·February 23, 2022
Why the Karnataka Protection of Right to Freedom of Religion Bill is unlikely to pass Constitutional muster·December 31, 2021
Hijab ban: State can't dictate what is essential religious practice, argues counsel before Karnataka HC·February 14, 2022
Bombay High Court rejects plea seeking permission for congregational prayer at a Mumbai mosque during Ramzan·April 14, 2021
One year later: ruined aspirations, inordinate delays mark the yet-to-begin trial for the first accused arrested under UP’s ‘love jihad’ law·December 27, 2021
To hold or not Amarnath Yatra a matter must be left to Executive to decide, says SC while declining to restrict it·July 13, 2020
Sabarimala forces us to recognise the hitherto unacknowledged yet omnipresent socio-legal violence against women·February 7, 2019
Karnataka hijab ban: opinions from Supreme Court’s Sabarimala judgment show the way·February 24, 2022
Allahabad HC refuses to quash FIR against Hindu Mahasabha leader for communal slur on AMU and its founder·January 23, 2021
Constitutional challenge to Sabarimala Temple ban on women’s entry: Read Indira Jaising’s written submissions·July 17, 2018
Laws against “Love Jihad” is about misplaced anxieties about demographic increase and vilifying a community for electoral needs·December 1, 2020
Vague, unreasonable, constitutionally untenable: Why Indian variant of ‘blasphemy law’ – Section 295A IPC – should go·August 21, 2018
