Sabarimala: Not adhering to the Supreme Court judgment is flouting one of the constitutionally strongest verdicts of our times·January 14, 2019
Ban on hijab valid, not violative of Article 25: PU College and CDC argue before Karnataka HC·February 23, 2022
Doctrine of constitutional morality favours girls’ choice to wear hijab, counsel tells Karnataka HC·February 24, 2022
UP cabinet approves “love jihad” ordinance to punish interfaith marriages without informing District Magistrate·November 24, 2020
SC agrees to examine validity of law preserving religious character of places of worship as existing on Aug 15, 1947; notice issued to Centre·March 12, 2021
Love Jihad: Inter-faith marriage a clash between pre-modern society and the modern state·November 25, 2020
Despite pliant media, VHP-RSS meet at Ayodhya was a flop; Supreme Court mustn’t buckle under communal pressure·November 29, 2018
Practice of hijab is against constitutional morality and individual dignity, Karnataka Government tells HC·February 22, 2022
Mathura Court rejects suit seeking removal of Masjid Idgah allegedly built on Shrikrishna Janam Bhoomi·September 30, 2020
Blasphemy laws remain philosophically fallacious, legally unconstitutional; so remove IPC 295A, don’t bolster it·September 25, 2018
Constitutional challenge to Sabarimala Temple ban on women’s entry: Read Indira Jaising’s written submissions·July 17, 2018
