Vague, unreasonable, constitutionally untenable: Why Indian variant of ‘blasphemy law’ – Section 295A IPC – should go·August 21, 2018
Female genital mutilation must be abolished because it’s criminally liable abuse of the girl child, and hardly an ‘essential religious practice’·August 20, 2018
Last day of Sabarimala: Rights of deity as a juristic entity are for suing and being sued: Read Indira Jaising’s additional rejoinder submissions·August 2, 2018
The ‘celibacy vs menstruation’ non-debate: Why arguments for Sabarimala temple’s ban on women are flawed·July 28, 2018
Sabarimala, Day 5: Lord Ayappa is a juristic person, but does Constitution favour gods over individuals?·July 26, 2018
Sabarimala case: Justice Chandrachud says assuming women cannot perform 41-day penance is unconstitutional·July 24, 2018
Right to keep women away from Sabarimala temple is a form of untouchability: Indira Jaising to Supreme Court·July 18, 2018
Constitutional challenge to Sabarimala Temple ban on women’s entry: Read Indira Jaising’s written submissions·July 17, 2018
