Maharashtra Government’s decision to monitor marriages is the latest push towards ‘othering’ experiment·December 28, 2022
Analysing the effect of UPR report recommendation in the context of India: Third UPR cycle·December 24, 2022
Supreme Court issues notice in petition calling for POCSO Act to take precedence over personal laws·December 13, 2022
Bilkis Bano’s review petition presents Supreme Court an opportunity to redeem itself·December 1, 2022
A pan-Indian law against ‘forced’ conversions should respect right to privacy and not appear to be arbitrary·November 22, 2022
Union Government’s opposition to plea seeking SC Status for Dalits who converted to Christianity or Islam is not persuasive enough·November 15, 2022
Supreme Court directs Union Government to indicate steps to deal with religious conversion by force and deceit·November 14, 2022
As Supreme Court hears petitions challenging CAA’s validity, Union Government questions petitioners’ locus·October 31, 2022
Supreme Court’s split verdict on hijab: Discipline, individual right and democratic politics·October 28, 2022
Unpacking the Varanasi court’s Gyanvapi order and the recent challenges to The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991·October 17, 2022
Dawoodi Bohras excommunication case: Supreme Court reserves order on referring the matter to a larger bench·October 11, 2022
Ten takeaways from petitioners’ responses, as Supreme Court concludes hearing on hijab ban·September 22, 2022
Hijab not part of fundamental right to freedom of expression: Respondents before the Supreme Court·September 21, 2022
Hijab ban: Can we decide without going into the Essential Religious Practice doctrine, asks Supreme Court·September 20, 2022
Hijab ban: To what extent Constituent Assembly Debates can be a guide, asks Supreme Court·September 19, 2022
